A comparison of the second amendment versus a police state

Under this "individual right theory," the United States Constitution restricts legislative bodies from prohibiting firearm possession, or at the very least, the Amendment renders prohibitory and restrictive regulation presumptively unconstitutional.

A comparison of the second amendment versus a police state

Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the Second Amendment does not provide protection for what it deemed assault weapons, nor does it protect any magazine larger than 10 rounds. Annapolis, MD — While Americans watched the Olympics and mainstream media put on scripted town hall meetings to demonize law-abiding citizens who own guns, the 4th U.

The ruling was not without harsh dissent, however. Heller explicitly excluded such coverage, according to NBC. The citizens who call for themselves and their neighbors to be disarmed, likely think no deeper than the shallow speeches given by the political blowhards, designed to appeal to emotion only.

They do not think of what happens during and after the government attempts to remove guns from society. They also completely ignore the fact that criminals do not obey laws and making guns illegal would have zero effect on criminals possessing guns.

But how effective would disarming the citizens actually be at preventing gun violence, while at the same time keeping guns in the hands of government?

Gun Control versus Gun Rights

One simple way to determine the outcome would be to compare mass shootings in America with those killed by police. It is entirely too easy to compare all senseless murders carried out by the state to those carried out by citizens, so we will zoom in with a microscope.

Now, on to the micro-comparison. As Mother Jones notes, in their database, they exclude shootings stemming from more conventional crimes such as armed robbery or gang violence. Other news outlets and researchers have published larger tallies that include a wide range of gun crimes in which four or more people have been either wounded or killed.

So, for the sake of simplicity, we will compare all of the mass shooting deaths in the last 35 years, to the number of citizens killed by police since the beginning of last year.

A comparison of the second amendment versus a police state

Already, inAmerican police have killed people. When we add that to 1, people killed by police inthat number is 1, When comparing the total number of mass shootings over the last 35 years to just the last 14 months of police killings the ratio is 1.

That is a massive difference. The comparison is staggering and should shock the conscience.

First and Second Amendments | Rights | Constitution USA | PBS

But to truly get a perspective, lets go back three years and compare all of the citizens killed by cops since the beginning of to the number of mass shooting deaths.

Sincecops in America have killed 3, citizens. In a time period that is less than one-tenth the amount of time it took mass shooters to kill people, cops have killed nearly 5 times as many citizens. Of course, a society without guns sounds fantastic and, in a perfect utopian world, it would be nice not to need a gun.

However, we do not live in utopia. As John Locke stated, self-defense is the first law of nature. Each person owns his or her own life and no other person has a right to take that life.The Second Amendment's Second-Class Citizens Black citizens of the United States have seldom enjoyed the same right to bear arms that whites do.

The Second Amendment Vs A Police State | Essay Writing

David A. Graham.

A comparison of the second amendment versus a police state

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Such language has created considerable debate regarding the Amendment's intended scope.

The Second Amendment provides U.S. citizens the right to bear arms. Ratified in December , the amendment says: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the.

If the Second Amendment is intended to preserve a measure of state military independence, then a prohibition on state military forces is surely suspect, and might be regarded as having been implicitly repealed (p)by the Second Amendment. The state constitution states that: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The court viewed the provision as protecting the right to carry arms in public.

The second problem with the use of SAC dolls is that there are no published comparison data with which to compare the responses of children who have been referred for a sexual abuse evaluation with those who have not been suspected of being abused.

The Second Amendment vs A Police State | Essay Writing